Loading...

Brussels proposes 30,000-strong Frontex with deportation powers

By: beam
European Union and Frontex flags flying outside a modern glass building against a clear blue sky
Image courtesy of Grand Warszawski via iStock

The European Commission wants Frontex to become the EU’s central actor for border protection and returns, with a standing corps of 30,000 officers and new powers to help deport people from non-EU countries.

The proposed Frontex expansion would also give the agency a rapid-response force, a social media monitoring centre and almost double its budget. 

“Today we propose that Frontex becomes the central EU actor on returns,” Magnus Brunner, EU Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, told reporters.

The Commission links the plan to its 2024–2029 political guidelines and to President Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the Union address this year. The European Parliament and the Council must agree before any of it becomes law.

Bigger corps, deeper pockets

The 30,000 figure would be built in layers. According to the Commission, Frontex would double its standing corps and create a “European border and return reserve” of 17,000 officers, deployable as needed.

The existing 7,000 officers seconded from member states would stay in place. The reserve would take shape within the next 15 years and remain at member states’ disposal.

For context, the standing corps is already due to reach 10,000 by 2027 under the agency’s 2019 review.

Frontex would also gain the right to buy, lease and co-own equipment, and to act as a central purchasing body, including for digital and AI-enabled tools. The aim is to cut reliance on individual governments for kit and personnel during emergencies.

Money follows the mandate. The Commission has proposed €11.8bn for Frontex under the 2028–2034 EU budget, almost twice the current seven-year allocation, though the figure remains open to negotiation.

Returns beyond Europe’s doorstep

The returns mandate marks the biggest shift. A new Return Coordination Centre would gather and analyse operational information and help plan deportations across the EU.

Frontex support would cover the whole process. That runs from early identification and voluntary return counselling to return operations and reintegration assistance.

The agency could also help carry out returns from one non-EU country to another, provided the country concerned signs an agreement. For example, Frontex could deport a Bangladeshi national from Libya, a common starting point for the final leg into Europe.

That would place European personnel in removal operations conducted entirely outside EU territory. The Commission insists such work would comply with fundamental rights and international standards.

Under the Commission’s framing, national governments would retain the final say on individual immigration decisions. Frontex would supply the operational capacity to carry them out.

A white private jet with three rear-mounted engines and red and black stripes parked on an airport tarmac under a blue sky
Image courtesy of Andrew Mark via Pexels

Ceuta’s long shadow

The crisis tools trace back to this summer’s mass crossing into Ceuta, Spain’s North African enclave.

Spain asked Frontex, Europol and the European Union Agency for Asylum for help. Italy placed temporary border controls on travel from Spain, and Spain’s prime minister at the time branded several member states’ response “selfish”.

“We need to learn the lesson. Therefore, we propose for Frontex to detect dangerous trends early,” Brunner told reporters.

One part of the answer is a Quick Reaction Force that the Frontex Executive Director could deploy at a member state’s request. Brunner said it “can deploy within 24 hours and spot risks early, before an event becomes a crisis.”

A new Online Monitoring and Response Centre would scan publicly accessible social media for border-related developments. It would also support action against illegal online content linked to border-security risks.

Member states would have to flag events with potential significant impact on EU borders within 24 hours. Those reports would go through the EUROSUR information network.

Paperwork goes digital

A companion regulation would digitalise return, readmission and reintegration cases. The Commission says it would speed up procedures, cut admin and improve data sharing.

It follows the new Return Regulation, which entered into force on 16 October 2026. That framework, agreed earlier this year, opened the door to return hubs in non-EU countries.

Close-up of a hard drive partially removed from a server rack, with green indicator lights glowing in the background

Watchdog on shorter leash

The reform would narrow the scope of Frontex’s internal fundamental-rights watchdog. Complaints would go to national authorities instead.

Tineke Strik, a Dutch MEP from the Greens/EFA group, accused the Commission of “pandering to populism and the far right on migration”. She warned it “risks turning Frontex into a European version of ICE”.

Strik also cautioned that third-country operations without proper oversight could weaken accountability. She argued they could blur European staff’s legal responsibilities.

The agency has faced accountability questions before. Allegations of fundamental rights violations and pushbacks culminated in the 2022 resignation of then-Executive Director Fabrice Leggeri, now a far-right MEP.

The Commission maintains that respect for fundamental rights and human dignity is built into Frontex’s mandate and operations.

Steady climb since 2004

Frontex launched in 2004, and its budget, staff and political profile have grown fast since. Its current rulebook, the Frontex Regulation, entered into force in 2019.

The Commission says the agency’s role has expanded since then in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s war against Ukraine and attempts to weaponise migration at external borders. Member states, meanwhile, increasingly push on returns, arguing too many people ordered to leave stay in the bloc.

Capitals hold the pen

Taken together, the plan would give Frontex the people, equipment, data, and coordination it needs to work in practice. Ceuta gives Brussels its case for speed, while the narrower watchdog gives critics their case for caution.

For member states, the deal would mean more shared capacity in exchange for some operational discretion. For people facing removal, deportations could increasingly happen outside Europe, with complaints handled at national level.

Talks in Parliament and Council will set how far the mandate stretches, with negotiations on the €11.8bn allocation running alongside. Returns between non-EU countries would depend on agreements yet to be concluded, and the 2027 goal of 10,000 officers offers an early test of the 30,000 ambition.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments